Topics

Signup for
eHay Weekly

Hay & Forage Grower Magazine

BeefCowCalf.com

University
Links

About Us

Home


Search For:


Topics » Silage Management and Production » Species/Varieties/Cultivars

2000 Texas Panhandle Forage Sorghum Trial
Factsheet, 2000
Texas A&M University
- PDF format

2001 Texas Panhandle Irrigated Sorghum Silage Trial
Factsheet, 2001
Texas A&M University
- PDF format

2002 Texas Panhandle Forage Sorghum Silage Trial
Factsheet, 2002
Texas A&M University
- PDF format

Agronomic Performance and Silage Quality Traits of Sorghum Hybrids in 1992 and 1994
Research Report, 1995
Kansas State University
- PDF format

Continuation of the evaluation of selection progress in WFISILO, WFISIHI, and WQS initiated in 2000.
Research Report, 2001
University of Wisconsin
- HTML format

Corn Germplasms for Silage Uses
Research Report, 1995
University of Wisconsin
- HTML format

Effects of Hybrid Maturity and Growth Stage on Yield and Composition of Forage and Grain Sorghums when Harvested as Silage
Research Report, 1985
Kansas State University
- PDF format

Evaluation 31 promising GEM lines crossed to LH185, LH198, HC33, or LH283.
Research Report, 2003
University of Wisconsin
- HTML format

Evaluation of 132 S4+ lines from WQS C1 topcrossed to LH198
Research Report, 2002
University of Wisconsin
- PDF format

Evaluation of 137 S4+ lines from WQS C1 topcrossed to HC33
Research Report, 2002
University of Wisconsin
- PDF format

Evaluation of 169 S2+ families from CUBA164:S1517, CUBA164:S15, and CUBA117:S1520 topcrossed to LH279.
Research Report, 2003
University of Wisconsin
- HTML format

Evaluation of 226 S2 families from WQS C2 topcrossed to HC33.
Research Report, 2003
University of Wisconsin
- HTML format

Evaluation of 26 promising GEM lines crossed to LH185, LH198, or LH283
Research Report, 2002
University of Wisconsin
- HTML format

Evaluation of 4 S6+ lines from WQS C0 topcrossed to LH198, LH227, LH244, LH295, and HC33.
Research Report, 2002
University of Wisconsin
- PDF format

Evaluation of 41 S5+ lines from WQS C0 topcrossed to LH198.
Research Report, 2002
University of Wisconsin
- PDF format

Evaluation of 45 S5+ lines from WQS C0 topcrossed to HC33.
Research Report, 2002
University of Wisconsin
- PDF format

Evaluation of 55 S1+ families from the GEM program as well as advanced lines from WQS and other breeding populations topcrossed to HC33 and LH198.
Research Report, 2003
University of Wisconsin
- HTML format

Evaluation of 61 promising GEM lines crossed to HC33, LH185, LH279, LH287, or LH295
Research Report, 2002
University of Wisconsin
- HTML format

Evaluation of early-maturing silage hybrids including lines from WFISILO and WQS.
Research Report, 1999
University of Wisconsin
- HTML format

Evaluation of elite S2 to S3 lines from WQS C0 and several GEM breeding populations topcrossed to LH198.
Research Report, 2000
University of Wisconsin
- HTML format

Evaluation of elite S3+ lines from WQS C0 topcrossed to R227 and B77. Inbreds R227 and B77 were chosen based on rapid digestion kinetics (Jung et al., 1998).
Research Report, 2000
University of Wisconsin
- HTML format

Evaluation of elite S4+ lines from WFISIHI, WFISILO, and WQS C0, topcrossed to LH198.
Research Report, 2000
University of Wisconsin
- HTML format

Evaluation of GEM breeding crosses topcrossed to LH185 and LH198
Research Report, 1999
University of Wisconsin
- HTML format

Evaluation of hybrids derived from WFISIHI crossed to A632 x A635 and LH223.
Research Report, 1999
University of Wisconsin
- HTML format

Evaluation of hybrids derived from WFISIHI crossed to LH227 and LH223.
Research Report, 1999
University of Wisconsin
- HTML format

Next Page » Pages: [1] 2 3